BlackRock reviews

3.7

68% would recommend to a friend

(6,559 total reviews)
avatar

Laurence D. Fink

82% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

BlackRock has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 6,559 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The BlackRock employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finance industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

7K reviews
1.0
Aug 17, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

BlackRock is a reputatable and world largest asset manager. - insurance cover is amazing - lots of company events - good for learning and knowledge is everywhere - Big company name and software. Good for the next job. - Lick the boots work here as long as you are good at it. - Good for new graduates. Learn, thank and move on.

Cons

- Salary is lower than market for ops and tech. - HR almost does not exist unable something bad happens. - Meritocracy is oversold. It's all about networking and getting into your manager's book. - Overworked. Even though there is a unlimited leave policy, people are afraid to take leave. Managers make you feel threatened or guilt thread whenever you are away. - A lot of social groups and events. But if I don't get on your manager's book, they assumed you are too free to join these events even though they are done outside work hours. - noticed that there are a lot of possibility fake reviews here to make the company look better than it is. Be aware. - HQ is US, decisions are make in US and UK. Asia offices are followers. Voice always unheard.

4.0
Jan 7, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

> Very advanced tech - all systems and databases in the firm are integrated under a single name (Aladdin) - which you can install modules and access as long as you have the permissions. CRM system, Account Maintenance system, Compliance systems, are all linked together - you will not have any "outdated" information or require to do any "updating". > Minimal knowledge walls except for confidential business dealings - you can learn as much as you want, there is a "wikipedia" like site where all teams have a certain amount of knowledge listed there. Slightly outdated and high-level at times, but sufficiently detailed enough to be very well-informed about any process you want to learn about. > People are approachable - no matter the rank - and are willing to spend 30 minutes to explain things to you (as long as you are asking questions relevant to their rank - no point asking about technical stuff with a MD!) > Management dares to make declarations and guarantees, and they take care of their staff - e.g. during the handling of COVID, they made multiple declarations - one where that no one would be fired until end of 2020 (barring performance issues), and another that there will be no compulsion AT ALL to return to office if we are uncomfortable doing so. Loved it when they did that.

Cons

> 5-point rating system - where "Strongly Performed" is the center rating, and there are 2 more ratings above - "Outperformed" and "Strongly Outperformed". Makes people who perform strongly, feel average. Of course, it could be argued that it drives strong staff to work even harder (as there are 2 more grades to "attain"). Or perhaps its similar to "tall... and taller" when referring to short and tall people. My take is that "Outperformed" should already indicate a potential promotion candidate -- and "Strongly Outperformed" should not exist - as these people should already have been promoted (i.e. the concept of outperforming an outperformer feels... weird)? > Very specialist roles / high demands even at Analyst / Associate levels leading to low mobility at those levels - an "Associate" would already be expected to know all related technical & financial knowledge regarding the process (and 30-40% of people having 5-10 years experience) - at a minimum, people need to be a VP to even consider mobility into another team to learn something different. Changing teams would literally be resetting the clock (as you would not have the knowledge). Also, imagine trying to compete with people with 5-10yrs experience for promotion... even if you have the same no. of years, you'd just be on par. You'd need very special reasons / projects to get ahead - and not many of these are available due to the highly specialized teams (which mainly focus on their part of the process). > Although availability of knowledge is listed as a "Pro" above, in terms of working-level knowledge, these are recorded in procedure documents that are confusing to the new joiner, or not recorded at all. Although the process I am in is highly variable in terms of its product / country mix and the steps are very granular, the same products / countries are generally handled through the same checking points / steps (and should be listed down lest a detail is missed and downstream impacts occur).

2.0
Jul 22, 2023

Great Brand, Big Name. Be mindful before taking the leap of faith.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Big Name and Brand. Easy to attract strong talents for hire due to Brand name. Knowledge is everywhere. So much talents in the company or been to this company that a lot of documentations are left inside but need to be found. Easier to access knowledge and information than other traditional firms. Office is clean and nice looking. Pantry is fine, not great but usable with free coffee.

Cons

Compensation: Lower than market average compensation. Only the top notch or sales get the pie. Don't try to paint an image that Blackrock is great and can pay a lot. Tend to play with your bonus, it's seriously sad. 3 quarters of high performance, and the quarter before salary review/Bonus, they will be in 'hardship'. You go figure that out. Some graduate analysts and pets of managers will yell you otherwise. Playing of Favorism is obvious here. Management: Toxic management. Of course, this is dependent on the team or manager you work for. But in general, they are a traditional typical company that cares only for new blood. There were some MDs who told me directly that older workers are tainted papers and graduate analysts are fresh new paper. Again, you go figure how management is. Culture: Diversity, Equality and Inclusive! Yes it's branding is amazing! No Black or Asian discrimination! No Age and handicap or LGBT discrimination! Everything on the surface is amazing! Running of company wide events, articles, posters everywhere. But people who truly touch their heart and not sugar coating or superficial will be able to tell you what the reality is. Yes, diversity is true. gender and race are statistically managed. Equality and inclusiveness are otherwise. Yes, you get discriminated (obviously in untold manner). No bullies in the world will think they are bullying. And yes, sometimes they admit it in your face, even asking you back "so what if I'm doing this, what can you do? who will believe you?". Often in a take it or leave it situation. One even told me once "There are others out there happy to take your job". There are some people who might be suspicious of what I'm saying. But for someone who worked for almost 10 years here, every single words are heartfelt. The experience is real. Why didn't I quit during that period? Because I love my colleagues who suffered the same with me. People work hard here, it's no joke. Not a single ex-colleague including myself who left did not have a better career and live. Most I've known have gotten better in every way. Please detect for flags and think twice before committing your life to Blackrock. For learning, it's great. For career, ensure you are either a graduate analyst or an amazing bootlicker. It's not for the authentic and faithful.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 6,559 Reviews

Glassdoor has 7,743 BlackRock reviews submitted anonymously by BlackRock employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if BlackRock is right for you.