GIC reviews

3.0

38% would recommend to a friend

(564 total reviews)
avatar

Lim Chow Kiat

57% approve of CEO

31% positive business outlook

GIC has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 564 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The GIC employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finance industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

564 reviews
1.0
Jun 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The engineers and technical individual contributors on the ground are collaborative and hard-working.

Cons

Performative Leadership & Illusion of Transparency: The recent Technology Group (TG) townhall was an utter disappointment and a case study in corporate deflated trust. Leadership, specifically our new CTO Jim Adams, COO Sam, and the rest of the Technology Group Leadership Team (TGLT) purposely sidelined and ignored the actual top-voted questions on Pigeonhole that highlighted critical on-the-ground issues. Instead of addressing the systemic pain points that teams are genuinely struggling with, they bypassed the community’s voice. What is the actual point of using Pigeonhole if top-voted concerns are filtered out or swept under the rug while management just asks TGLT for curated answers publicly? To put it in perspective, leadership completely dodged or glossed over the actual top 3 highest-voted questions from the staff: George :) (top votes): "Could you share how our hiring process allows equal opportunity and reduce the influence of personal r/s" Tan: "Why do we continually add new processes (such as security checks driven by audit findings) without reviewing or consolidating existing ones to reduce the overall workload and effort by teams?" M****** Ong: "What’s your direction to TGLT in managing on-the-ground workload - lots of “management debt” to address (new work papers, policy/standard gaps) on top of business deliveries. Everything feels urgent!" By avoiding real topics like favoritism risks, crippling process bloat, and severe management debt/burnout, the townhall felt incredibly tone-deaf. It proves there is a gaping disconnect between executive talking points and the day-to-day friction felt by the actual technical teams.

4.0
Jun 12, 2026

Good career progression

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Generally a good company with good career progression. CEO is great, he’s very wise and truely wants the best for GIC and Singapore. Many reviews said WLB was bad, but compared to global IBs I find it much better here.

Cons

There are some pain points in certain parts of the organisation right now, and it’s disappointing that the leaders does not see or empathise with the level of severity of the issues.

1.0
Jun 12, 2026

The rot goes all the way to the core

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fancy office, pantry and equipment

Cons

Where do you even start? The negative reviews here are 100% real. The only fake ones are the 5 star "perfect dreamy" reviews, which is maybe HR desperately trying to inflate the score. Is HR really that incompetent? Absolutely. Their main function is protecting upper management, covering up blatant favoritism, and ignoring the actual workforce. They have like 100 people and outsource payroll, yet they can't even manage basic internal projections or track their own workforce metrics without relying on other departments to do the actual data work for them. The rest of the organization is stuck doing the analytical heavy lifting for them just to keep basic planning moving. It’s absurd that a massive HR department has to be carried by external teams on top of everyone else's core responsibilities. GIC loves to hire externally and preach about diversity, but they can't execute. Anyone who refuses to be a "yes man" or conform to their toxic practices is immediately labeled as "not a cultural fit." This used to be a solid workplace years ago, but it has completely rotted. If you aren't a favorite and don't have a political "godfather" backing you, you have to watch your back constantly because they are just waiting for you to slip up. The financial performance is just as bad. Year after year, returns decline. Management claims the target is just maintaining purchasing power, but they are stuck living in the past. If you calculate real returns using 20 years long term inflation data (1+%), the math is embarrassing. The average person on the street could get better yields from simple retail bank products or mutual funds. The markets hit new highs every year, yet GIC constantly finds new lows. Other sovereign wealth funds are delivering fantastic results with less than half the headcount. Meanwhile, GIC employs thousands of supposedly top notch people and consistently underperforms. This is Singapore’s future they are mismanaging.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 564 Reviews

Glassdoor has 832 GIC reviews submitted anonymously by GIC employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if GIC is right for you.